Doctor: what's wrong
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The BMJ is wrong: doctor assisted dying would overmedicalise death.
The BMJ has decided to support the Assisted Dying Bill. This is a mistake. Medicine wields at once too much power and too little. We are rather impotent, for example, around social inequalities.Despite evidence that financial gradients make health worse, we lack the clout to influence government policy to tackle them. Yet, on the flipside, medical power can be exerted firmly in places where a m...
متن کاملRapid Survey of Wasting and Stunting in Children: Whats New, Whats Old and Whats the Buzz?
Nationwide Rapid Survey on Children (RSoC), conducted by the Ministry of Women and Child Development and UNICEF in 2013-14 showed a marked improvement in the status of the child malnutrition over the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) that was conducted in 2005-06. Despite some impressive gains in the anthropometric indicators of malnutrition, the absolute levels remain high, and of c...
متن کاملSome whats, whys and worries of geoengineering
In this paper I discuss the nature of geoengineering, some of its attractions, and some reasons for concern. I claim that there is confusion in the use of the term ‘geoengineering’ that is related to larger concerns about the language in which responses to climate change are discussed. I conclude that despite some reasonable grounds for suspicion, research in areas that involve carbon dioxide r...
متن کاملWhats and whys with neonatal CT.
What and why? As health care professionals, we must address both of these questions in scientific inquiry as well as in clinical practice. Most times, facts (the “what”) are relatively easy to come by. The reasons (the “why”) behind these events are usually more difficult to discover and understand. Let us look at the example of head computed tomography (CT) in a group of neonates. There are 2 ...
متن کاملWrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable?
HYPOTHESIS Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events (WSPEs) are devastating, unacceptable, and often result in litigation, but their frequency and root causes are unknown. Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient events are likely more common than realized, with little evidence that current prevention practice is adequate. DESIGN Analysis of se...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
سال: 2006
ISSN: 0141-0768,1758-1095
DOI: 10.1177/014107680609900922